FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

10-Q 1 d431151d10q.htm FORM 10-Q FORM 10-Q

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

Commission file number 000-28401

MAXYGEN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		77-0449487
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

411 Borel Avenue Suite 616

San Mateo, California 94402

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(650) 241-2292

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of October 31, 2012, there were 27,801,220 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding, which is the only class of common or voting stock of the registrant issued.

MAXYGEN, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012


INDEX

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Financial Statements:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)			2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)			3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)			4

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			5

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			15

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			21

Item 4: Controls and Procedures			21

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings			22

Item 1A: Risk Factors			22

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			28

Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities			28

Item 4: Mine Safety Disclosures			28

Item 5: Other Information			28

Item 6: Exhibits			29

SIGNATURES			30

This report and the disclosures herein include, on a consolidated basis, the business and operations of Maxygen, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Maxygen ApS. In this report, “Maxygen,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to such consolidated entities, unless, in each case, the context indicates that the disclosure applies only to a named subsidiary.

Our web site is located at www.maxygen.com. We make available free of charge, on or through our web site, our annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Information contained on our web site is not part of this report.

Maxygen^® is a registered trademark of Maxygen, Inc. Other service marks, trademarks and trade names referred to in this report are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word “partner” and “partnership” does not mean a legal partner or legal partnership.

Forward Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the current expectations and beliefs of our management and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “can,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “intend,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. In any forward-looking statement in which we express an expectation or belief as to future results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement or expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements:

•

strategic alternatives and transactions with respect to our MAXY-G34 product candidate or our company and the timing, likelihood and outcome thereof;

•

our implementation, or our failure to implement, any additional distributions of our cash resources to stockholders and the treatment of any such distributions for tax purposes;

•

our ability to estimate and maintain adequate reserves to fund our current and longer term operational requirements, pursue our ongoing strategic evaluation and provide for potential future liabilities and claims, such as liabilities, claims, adjustments, penalties, interest and other amounts resulting from potential future tax audits or potential future litigation;

•

our ability to continue operations and our estimates for future performance and financial position of the company;

•

our ability to retain key employees to maintain our ongoing operations and, if necessary, our ability to successfully hire qualified personnel;

•

our ability to protect our intellectual property portfolio and rights;

•

our business strategies and plans; and

•

other economic, business, competitive, and/or regulatory factors affecting our business and the market we serve generally.

These statements are only predictions. Risks and uncertainties and the occurrence of other events could cause actual results to differ materially from these predictions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this report are set forth in this report, including the factors described in the section entitled “Item 1A—Risk Factors” and “Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as those discussed in our Current Reports on Form 8-K and other SEC filings. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, Maxygen is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable law.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MAXYGEN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	December 31, 2011			September 30, 2012
				(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	154,572		$	57,231
Short-term investments		4,999			24,999
Available-for-sale investment in equity securities		2,478			1,251
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,317			2,128

Total current assets		164,366			85,609
Property and equipment, net		143			126
Other non-current assets		124			—

Total assets	$	164,633		$	85,735

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	253		$	261
Accrued compensation		1,426			1,658
Distribution payable		704			1,303
Other accrued liabilities		831			456

Total current liabilities		3,214			3,678
Non-current distribution payable		372			310
Other non-current liabilities		103			103
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012		—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 27,398,829 and 27,462,144 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012, respectively		3			3
Additional paid-in capital		311,302			211,436
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,205			86
Accumulated deficit		(151,775	)		(129,881	)

Total Maxygen, Inc. stockholders’ equity		160,735			81,644
Non-controlling interest		209			—

Total stockholders’ equity		160,944			81,644

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	164,633		$	85,735

MAXYGEN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except per share data)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012			2011			2012
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Technology and license revenue	$	555		$	5		$	558		$	30,011
Operating expenses:
Research and development		7			147			1,357			212
General and administrative		2,343			2,598			8,121			7,783

Total operating expenses		2,350			2,745			9,478			7,995
Income (loss) from operations		(1,795	)		(2,740	)		(8,920	)		22,016
Gain on distribution of equity securities		44			64			293			207
Interest and other income, net		659			58			968			227

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,092	)		(2,618	)		(7,659	)		22,450
Income tax benefit (expense)		727			(36	)		3,101			(106	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations		(365	)		(2,654	)		(4,558	)		22,344
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations		—			—			1,302			—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		—			—			62,219			—
Income tax expense for discontinued operations		(1,948	)		—			(4,986	)		—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(1,948	)		—			58,535			—

Net income (loss)		(2,313	)		(2,654	)		53,977			22,344
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			310			450

Net income (loss) attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(2,313	)	$	(2,654	)	$	53,667		$	21,894

Basic net income (loss) per share:
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.17	)	$	0.80
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	2.02		$	—
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.10	)	$	1.85		$	0.80
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.17	)	$	0.80
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	2.02		$	—
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.10	)	$	1.85		$	0.80
Cash distribution declared per common share	$	—		$	3.60		$	—		$	3.60

Shares used in basic net income (loss) per share calculations		28,358			27,358			28,976			27,280
Shares used in diluted net income (loss) per share calculations		28,358			27,358			28,976			27,467

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(3,820	)	$	(2,967	)	$	51,738		$	20,775

MAXYGEN, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)


	Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012
	(unaudited)
Operating activities
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(4,558	)	$	22,344
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		7			41
Gain on distribution of equity securities		(293	)		(207	)
Non-cash stock compensation		2,235			2,147
Amortization of discount on investments		—			(21	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		(3,101	)		106
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		42			4
Valuation of stock portion of distribution payable		(869	)		(196	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivable from Perseid		1,123			—
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,699	)		189
Deposits and other non-current assets		2,017			124
Accounts payable		(163	)		8
Accrued compensation		(810	)		(123	)
Other accrued liabilities		(455	)		(367	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(6,524	)		24,049

Investing activities
Purchase of available-for-sale securities		—			(42,978	)
Maturities of available-for-sale securities		—			23,000
Acquisition of property and equipment		(46	)		(27	)
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		76,000			—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		75,954			(20,005	)

Financing activities
Cash distributions paid to common stockholders		(187	)		(99,170	)
Net liquidating dividend of subsidiary		—			(659	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of stock repurchased to settle employee tax obligations		523			(20	)
Repurchase of common stock		(11,094	)		(1,536	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(10,758	)		(101,385	)

Cash used in discontinued operations:
Operating activities		453			—
Investing activities		(750	)		—

Net cash used in discontinued operations		(297	)		—

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		58,375			(97,341	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		102,335			154,572

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	160,710		$	57,231

MAXYGEN, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. The information as of September 30, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the management of Maxygen, Inc. (the “Company”) believes necessary for fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In addition, results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for any future interim period or for the entire year. The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

On May 16, 2011, Astellas Pharma Inc. (“Astellas”) completed the purchase of the Company’s equity interests in Perseid Therapeutics LLC (“Perseid”), the Company’s former majority-owned subsidiary. As a result of this transaction, the results of operations and cash flows of Perseid, as well as any related business activities through May 16, 2011 have been reported separately as discontinued operations in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for all periods presented.

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the amounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Maxygen ApS. The condensed consolidated financial statements also include the amounts of the Company’s former majority-owned subsidiaries, Perseid (through its acquisition by Astellas on May 16, 2011) (see Note 7) and Maxygen Holdings LLC (through its dissolution on June 21, 2012) and the Company’s former wholly-owned subsidiaries, Maxygen Holdings (U.S.), Inc. and Maxygen Holdings, Inc. (through their dissolution on August 9, 2012).

Prior to the acquisition of Perseid by Astellas on May 16, 2011, the Company was the primary beneficiary of Perseid, as determined under applicable accounting standards. In connection with the Company’s prior joint venture arrangement with Astellas, Astellas had acquired a minority interest in Perseid. Prior to the acquisition, amounts pertaining to the ownership interests held by Astellas in the operating results and financial position of Perseid were reported as non-controlling interests.

In addition, prior to its dissolution on June 21, 2012, the Company was the primary beneficiary of its majority-owned subsidiary, Maxygen Holdings LLC. In May 2010, the Company sold a minority membership interest in Maxygen Holdings LLC to a third party for $200,000 in cash and a contingent promissory note. In connection with its dissolution, Maxygen Holdings LLC issued a liquidating dividend to each of its members and, as a result, the third party received $659,000 (net of payments made by the third party to the Company pursuant to the contingent promissory note). Prior to the dissolution, amounts pertaining to the ownership interest held by such third party in the operating results and financial position of Maxygen Holdings LLC were reported as a non-controlling interest.

The table below reflects a reconciliation of the equity attributable to non-controlling interests (in thousands):


Non-controlling interests at December 31, 2011	$	209
Income attributable to non-controlling interest		450
Liquidating dividend to non-controlling interest at June 21, 2012		(659)

Non-controlling interests at September 30, 2012	$	—

Revenue Recognition

The Company has recognized revenue from multiple element arrangements under collaborative research agreements, including license payments, research and development services, milestones, and royalties. Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting if certain criteria are met. The Company estimates the selling price for each deliverable using the vendor specific objective evidence of selling price, if it exists, otherwise third-party evidence of selling price. If neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence of selling price exists for a deliverable, then the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for that deliverable. The consideration the Company receives is allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their respective estimated selling prices, and the applicable revenue recognition criteria are considered separately for each of the separate units.

Incentive milestone payments may be triggered either by the results of the Company’s research efforts or by events external to the Company, such as regulatory approval to market a product. Consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone can be recognized in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the consideration earned from the achievement of a milestone meets all the criteria for the milestone to be considered substantive at the inception of the arrangement. For a milestone to be considered substantive, the consideration earned by achieving the milestone should (i) be commensurate with either the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the Company’s performance to achieve the milestone, (ii) relate solely to past performance and (iii) be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement.

Contingent payments for events for which the occurrences are contingent solely upon the passage of time or are the result of performance by a third party will be recognized as revenue when payments are earned, the amounts are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

Royalties are recorded as earned in accordance with the contract terms when third party sales can be reliably measured and collectability is reasonably assured.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. During the periods in which the Company has net income from continuing operations, the diluted net income per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and other dilutive securities.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and dilutive net income (loss) per share computations and the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012			2011			2012
Numerator:
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from continuing operations	$	(365	)	$	(2,654	)	$	(4,868	)	$	21,894
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from discontinued operations	$	(1,948	)	$	—		$	58,535		$	—

Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(2,313	)	$	(2,654	)	$	53,667		$	21,894


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012			2011			2012
Denominator:
Basic and diluted:
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share		28,358			27,358			28,976			27,280
Effect of dilutive securities		—			—			—			187

Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share		28,358			27,358			28,976			27,467

Basic net income (loss) per share:
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from continuing operations	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.17	)	$	0.80
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	2.02		$	—

Attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.10	)	$	1.85		$	0.80

Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from continuing operations.	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.17	)	$	0.80
Attributable to Maxygen, Inc. from discontinued operations	$	(0.07	)	$	—		$	2.02		$	—

Attributable to Maxygen, Inc.	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.10	)	$	1.85		$	0.80

The total number of shares excluded from the calculations of diluted net income (loss) per share was approximately 6,854,000 options and 785,000 shares of restricted stock at September 30, 2011 and 5,401,000 options and 17,000 shares of restricted stock at September 30, 2012. These securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share as their effect on results from continuing operations is anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is primarily comprised of net income (loss), net unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities, including the Company’s equity investment in Codexis, Inc. (“Codexis”) and its related tax effects, and foreign currency translation adjustments.

The changes in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investment in equity securities represent the change in fair value of 413,033 shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock held by the Company and the distribution of shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock awards in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock being retained by the Company primarily represent shares reserved on behalf of the holders of certain outstanding equity awards.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income was as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2011			September 30, 2012
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment in equity securities	$	2,478		$	1,251
Tax effects of available-for-sale securities		(1,021	)		(913	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(252	)		(252	)

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	1,205		$	86

The tax effects of available-for-sale securities of approximately $1.0 million recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2011 resulted from the application of the Company’s statutory tax rate on its gross unrealized gains on its investment in Codexis, Inc. common stock (based on the fair value of such investment at December 31, 2011). In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, changes in tax effects of available for sale securities recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income were reclassified to expense as a result of the release of Codexis, Inc. common stock in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards.

Stock-Based Compensation

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, stock-based compensation expense was recorded as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2011		2012		2011		2012
Research and development	$	—	$	—	$	408	$	—
General and administrative		281		899		1,827		2,147

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	281	$	899	$	2,235	$	2,147

Stock Options

Stock options are generally scheduled to vest over four years and all options expire no later than 10 years from the grant date. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.

The weighted average assumptions used in the model for options granted in the respective periods are outlined in the following tables:


	Three months ended September 30, 2011		Three months ended September 30, 2012 (1)
Expected dividend yield		—		—
Risk-free interest rate		—		—
Expected life		—		—
Expected volatility		—		—


	Nine months ended September 30, 2011			Nine months ended September 30, 2012 (1)
Expected dividend yield		—			—
Risk-free interest rate		2.26% to 2.42	%		—
Expected life		6.26 years			—
Expected volatility		61.46% to 61.61	%		—

(1)	There were no stock options granted to employees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company has granted restricted stock awards under its 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) to certain employees and members of its board of directors. Restricted stock awards are generally scheduled to vest over four years. The 2006 Plan and related award agreement provide for forfeiture in certain events, such as voluntary termination of employment, and for acceleration of vesting in certain events, such as termination of employment without cause or a change in control of the Company. Compensation cost for these awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted restricted stock awards to its board members representing an aggregate of 40,000 shares of Company common stock. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recognized approximately $407,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense within continuing operations, related to its restricted stock awards. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized approximately $391,000 and $1.4 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense within continuing operations related to these restricted stock awards. At September 30, 2012, the unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards was approximately $1.9 million, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period applicable to each award. The amortization of these costs is expected to be completed by June 2016.

Contingent Performance Units

In September 2009, the Company granted contingent performance units (“CPUs”) under the 2006 Plan to all employees and board members who held options to purchase Company’s common stock, and since that date the Company has also granted CPUs in connection with the grant of new stock option awards. CPUs vest on the earliest to occur of (i) a change in control of the Company, (ii) a corporate dissolution or liquidation of the Company, (iii) an involuntary termination of employment without cause, or (iv) the fourth anniversary of the grant date (the “Settlement Date”), generally so long as the holder continues to provide services for the Company on a continuous basis from the grant date to the Settlement Date. All unvested CPUs remaining following the Settlement Date will expire immediately. The CPUs are designed to protect holders of the Company’s stock options against a reduction in the share price of the Company’s common stock resulting from dividends or distributions to the Company’s stockholders, which could negatively affect outstanding options held by option holders of the Company since the options would not otherwise participate in any dividends or distributions to the Company’s stockholders. The earned value of any vested CPU will generally be settled in shares of common stock of the Company, but may also be settled, in part, with cash or any property distributed by the Company, or entirely in cash. The CPU awards are accounted for as liability awards.

These awards were remeasured at estimated fair value as of September 30, 2012, as required for liability awards. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, approximately $42,000 in cash was paid to settle vested CPUs. The fair value of the remaining CPUs was approximately $1.5 million at September 30, 2012, as determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation.

The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of the CPUs at September 30, 2011 and 2012 are outlined in the following tables:


	Three months ended September 30, 2012	Nine months ended September 30, 2012
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate range	0.18% – 0.34%	0.18% – 0.42%
Expected life	0.98 – 2.67 years	0.98 – 3.17 years
Expected volatility of Maxygen, Inc. common stock	18.8% to 29.1%	18.8% to 42.0%
Expected volatility of Codexis, Inc. common stock	64.9% to 74.4%	63.0% to 74.4%


	Three months ended September 30, 2011	Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%
Risk-free interest rate range	0.23% – 0.60%	0.23% – 1.41%
Expected life	1.98 – 3.67 years	1.98 – 3.67 years
Expected volatility of Maxygen, Inc. common stock	40.00% to 63.1%	40.0% to 66.4%
Expected volatility of Codexis, Inc. common stock	57.7%	55.0% to 57.7%

The estimated remaining expected life of each award is based on the estimated remaining time to settlement for each award. Expected volatility of both the Company’s common stock and the Codexis, Inc. common stock is based on the historical volatility, as available, of such stock commensurate with the expected life of each award.

The Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $305,000 and $356,000 in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, related to changes in the fair value of the CPU liability within continuing operations. As the CPUs are accounted for as liability awards, the Company remeasures their fair value at each reporting date and records compensation expense utilizing a straight-line attribution method.

As the earned distribution value of any vested CPU can be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock, cash or the property distributed to stockholders, or any combination of the foregoing, and because such property has an inherent ability to appreciate or depreciate in price by the Settlement Date, the Company has reserved, from its December 2010 distribution of Codexis, Inc. common stock, the number of shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock that it deems sufficient to settle its maximum potential liability related to the earned distribution value for each CPU. At September 30, 2012, the Company had reserved 189,008 shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock for this purpose.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, stock-based compensation expense related to the remeasurement of CPUs was recorded within continuing operations as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012		2011		2012
Research and development	$	—		$	—	$	106	$	—
General and administrative		(322	)		305		12		356

Total stock-based compensation expense within continuing operations	$	(322	)	$	305	$	118	$	356

2. Cash Equivalents and Investments

The Company’s cash equivalents and investments as of September 30, 2012 were as follows (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Money market funds	$	57,231		$	—	$	—	$	57,231
U.S. Treasury securities		24,997			2		—		24,999
Available-for-sale investment in equity securities		—			1,251		—		1,251

Total		82,228			1,253		—		83,481
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents		(57,231	)		—		—		(57,231	)

Total investments	$	24,997		$	1,253	$	—	$	26,250

The Company’s cash equivalents and investments as of December 31, 2011 were as follows (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Money market funds	$	154,572		$	—	$	—	$	154,572
U.S. Treasury securities		4,999			—		—		4,999
Available-for-sale investment in equity securities		—			2,478		—		2,478

Total		159,571			2,478		—		162,049
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents		(154,572	)		—		—		(154,572	)

Total investments	$	4,999		$	2,478	$	—	$	7,477

At September 30, 2012, all investments had a contractual maturity of less than one year.

3. Fair Value

Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instrument’s anticipated life.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities and which reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

The following tables represent the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents and investments) and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):


	As of September 30, 2012
	Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	57,231	$	57,231	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		24,999		24,999		—		—
Available-for-sale investment in equity securities		1,251		1,251		—		—

Total	$	83,481	$	83,481	$	—	$	—

Liabilities:
Stock portion of distribution payable		132		132		—		—

Total	$	132	$	132	$	—	$	—


	As of December 31, 2011
	Estimated Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	154,572	$	154,572	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		4,999		4,999		—		—
Available-for-sale investment in equity securities		2,478		2,478		—		—

Total	$	162,049	$	162,049	$	—	$	—

Liabilities:
Stock portion of distribution payable		535		535		—		—

Total	$	535	$	535	$	—	$	—

As of September 30, 2012, the Company held 413,033 shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock, which is reflected on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as available-for-sale investment in equity securities for $1.3 million. As the fair value of the Company’s investment in Codexis, Inc. common stock was based on the $3.03 closing price of such stock on September 28, 2012, and because an active market exists for such shares, the Company has classified the fair value of this asset as a Level 1 asset within the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2011, the Company held 467,631 of such shares with a fair value of $2.5 million, based on the $5.30 closing price of such stock on December 30, 2011.

At September 30, 2012, the Company had an obligation to distribute 43,556 shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock to holders of the Company’s restricted stock awards. The fair value of this obligation of $132,000 is determined based on the $3.03 closing price of such stock on September 28, 2012. As of December 31, 2011, the obligation totaled $535,000, based on 101,005 shares of such stock with a $5.30 closing price on December 30, 2011. As the fair value was based on a quoted price in an active market, the Company classified this liability as a Level 1 liability within the fair value hierarchy and as the Stock portion of distribution payable in the table above.

4. Cash Distribution

On September 6, 2012, the Company distributed $3.60 in cash for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock, equal to approximately $98.5 million in the aggregate. For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the distribution will be a dividend to the extent it is paid out of the Company’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. Federal income tax principles. The Company currently estimate that less than 10% of the payment will be treated as a dividend for tax purposes, with the balance being a return of capital. This estimate is preliminary and subject to change based upon a comprehensive review and analysis of the Company’s historical results as well as actual results for the entire 2012 taxable year. Stockholders will receive a Form 1099-DIV in early 2013 notifying them of the portion of the special cash distribution that is treated as a dividend for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

5. Repurchases of Common Stock

From December 2009 through September 30, 2012, the Company repurchased a total of 12,506,627 shares of its common stock for a total cost of approximately $67.9 million. As further summarized below, these stock repurchases were conducted pursuant to a modified “Dutch auction” offer and through open market repurchases and private transactions.

In December 2009, the Company repurchased 7,345,103 shares pursuant to a modified “Dutch auction” tender offer at a total cost of approximately $39.2 million. In March 2010, the Company repurchased 1,433,361 shares from entities affiliated with GlaxoSmithKline plc at a per share price of $5.55, and the Company repurchased an additional 1,204,604 shares during 2010 as part of an open market repurchase program at an average price of $5.72 per share.

On May 31, 2011, the Company announced a stock repurchase program under which the Company was authorized to purchase up to $10.0 million of its common stock through December 31, 2011. On September 8, 2011, this repurchase program was increased from $10.0 million to $20.0 million. During 2011, the Company repurchased 2,244,289 shares of its common stock under this program at an aggregate cost of approximately $12.3 million. This program expired on December 31, 2011.

In January 2012, the Company announced a new stock repurchase program under which it is authorized to purchase up to $10.0 million of its common stock through December 31, 2012. In the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 279,270 shares of its common stock under this program at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.5 million. There were no repurchases of common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

The table below summarizes the Company’s repurchases of its common stock since 2009:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Total Costs, Net of Fees (In thousands)
Year ended December 31, 2009		7,345,103	$	39,170
Year ended December 31, 2010		2,637,965		14,889
Year ended December 31, 2011		2,244,289		12,256
Nine months ended September 30, 2012		279,270		1,536

Total		12,506,627	$	67,851

6. Related Party Transactions

Waverley

On April 1, 2006, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Waverley Associates, Inc. (“Waverley”), a private investment firm for which Mr. Isaac Stein is the president and sole stockholder. Mr. Stein also currently serves as executive chairman of the Company’s board of directors. The consulting agreement, as amended to date, provides for consulting fees payable to Waverley of $50,000 per month. The consulting agreement also provides for automatic renewal of the agreement for successive one-year terms and a two-year notice period for termination of the agreement by either party. Total expense under this arrangement was approximately $150,000 and $450,000 for each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2012. At September 30, 2012, $50,000 pertaining to this consulting agreement was recorded within accounts payable on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

7. Discontinued Operations

On May 16, 2011, Astellas acquired all of the Company’s equity interests in Perseid for $76.0 million in cash. Perseid, a former majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, conducted substantially all of the Company’s research and development operations. As a result of the acquisition of Perseid by Astellas, the Company reported the financial results of Perseid and its related business activities as discontinued operations. Summarized operating results for the discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012		2011			2012
Related party revenue (1)	$	—		$	—	$	15,979		$	—
Operating expenses:
Research and development		—			—		11,909			—
General and administrative		—			—		2,756			—

Total operating expenses		—			—		14,665			—

Income (loss) from operations of discontinued operations	$	—		$	—	$	1,314		$	—
Interest and other income (expense), net		—			—		(12	)		—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes		—			—		1,302			—
Income tax expense		(1,948	)		—		(4,986	)		—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		—			—		62,219			—

Income from discontinued operations	$	(1,948	)	$	—	$	58,535		$	—

(1)

Related party revenue consists of revenue recognized pursuant to the Company and Perseid’s various agreements with Astellas. Astellas owned approximately 16.7% of Perseid, prior to its purchase of the Company’s equity interests on May 16, 2011, and was therefore a related party in all periods prior to such sale.

8. Receipt of Contingent Payment from Bayer

In May, 2012, the Company received a $30.0 million payment from Bayer HealthCare LLC (“Bayer”) in connection with Bayer’s continued clinical development of a recombinant factor VIIa product candidate for the treatment of hemophilia. The Company sold the recombinant factor VIIa product candidate (previously designated by the Company as MAXY-VII) to Bayer, together with its other hematology assets, in July 2008 for an upfront cash payment of $90.0 million. The additional $30.0 million contingent payment was based on the further clinical development of the factor VIIa product candidate by Bayer and was also subject to the satisfaction of certain patent conditions related to these assets. The $30.0 million payment was recorded within Technology and license revenue on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. There are no remaining payments to be received from Bayer under our agreements with Bayer.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are a biopharmaceutical company that has historically focused on the discovery and development of improved next-generation protein pharmaceuticals for the treatment of disease and serious medical conditions.

Over the past several years, we have focused our efforts on maximizing stockholder value through sales, distributions and other arrangements involving our various assets. In May 2012, we received a final $30.0 million payment from Bayer HealthCare LLC, or Bayer, in connection with our sale of certain hematology assets to Bayer in July 2008. In May 2011, a subsidiary of Astellas Pharma Inc., or Astellas, acquired all of our interests in Perseid Therapeutics LLC, or Perseid, a former majority-owned subsidiary that included substantially all of our research and development operations and personnel, for $76.0 million in cash. In December 2010, we distributed substantially all of the shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock we held, together with approximately $29.2 million in cash, to our stockholders by way of pro rata special distributions that were classified as a return of capital to our stockholders for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In October 2010, we sold the patents and other intellectual property rights associated with the Molecular Breeding™ directed evolution platform to Codexis, Inc., or Codexis. In January 2010, we sold our vaccine related assets, including the related government grants to Altravax, Inc., or Altravax, a privately-held biopharmaceutical company. In addition, from December 2009 through September 30, 2012, we repurchased approximately 12.5 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $67.9 million.

In September 2012, we distributed $3.60 in cash for each outstanding share of our common stock, equal to approximately $98.5 million in the aggregate, to our stockholders by way of a pro rata special distribution that we expect will primarily be classified as a return of capital to our stockholders for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

We continue to retain all rights to our MAXY-G34 product candidate, a next-generation pegylated, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, or G-CSF, for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and acute radiation syndrome, or ARS, and we continue to focus on creating value from this program for our stockholders, principally through a sale or other transaction involving the program. We have no current plans to independently continue the further development of this product candidate for either indication and, to date, we have not been successful in identifying any potential transaction for the MAXY-G34 program. Accordingly, there can be no assurances we will be successful in identifying and consummating any such transaction in the future or be able to realize any value from this program.

We also continue to evaluate potential strategic options for our company as a whole, including a merger, reverse merger, sale or other strategic transaction. We also expect to evaluate and consider additional distributions to our stockholders of a portion of our cash resources in excess of our limited future operational requirements, amounts we consider appropriate to pursue our ongoing strategic evaluation and adequate reserves for potential future liabilities. Such distributions may be accomplished through cash dividends, stock repurchases or other mechanisms and may be fully or partially taxable depending on the circumstances of such distribution. We may also decide to cease all of our operations and seek stockholder approval of a plan of liquidation and dissolution so that we may liquidate all of our remaining assets, pay our known liabilities, distribute our remaining cash on hand (subject to the set aside of adequate reserves to cover known, unknown and contingent liabilities, including potential tax liabilities and potential claims in litigation) and dissolve. However, there can be no assurances that any particular course of action, business arrangement or transaction, or series of transactions, will be pursued, successfully consummated or lead to increased stockholder value or that we will make any additional cash distributions to our stockholders.

We currently have six employees, all of whom are engaged in general and administrative activities, and we have significantly curtailed our operations and decreased our operating expenses. However, we expect our operating expenses to increase if we pursue any strategic combination or other transactions.

At present, we have no significant source of recurring revenues. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $82.2 million as of September 30, 2012.

For the purposes of this report, our continuing operations consist of the results of Maxygen, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Maxygen ApS. Our condensed consolidated financial statements also include the amounts of our former majority-owned subsidiaries, Perseid (through its acquisition by Astellas on May 16, 2011) (see Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and Maxygen Holdings LLC (through its dissolution on June 21, 2012), and our former wholly-owned subsidiaries, Maxygen Holdings (U.S.), Inc. and Maxygen Holdings, Inc. (through their dissolution on August 9, 2012). Discontinued operations consist of the results of Perseid prior to the acquisition by Astellas of our interests in Perseid in May 2011.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Results of Operations

Revenues

Our revenues have historically been derived primarily from the sale of certain assets, collaboration agreements, technology and license arrangements and government research grants. Technology and license revenue in the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $30.0 million, which consisted primarily of revenue attributable to the final payment we received from Bayer. No significant revenue was recorded in the three month period ended September 30, 2012. Technology and license revenue in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 was $555,000 and $558,000, respectively, which consisted primarily of the final payment we received in July 2011 from Altravax in connection with its acquisition of substantially all of our vaccines assets in January 2010.

Research and Development Expenses

Our research and development expenses have historically consisted of external collaborative research expenses (including contract manufacturing, contract research and clinical trial expenses), salaries and benefits, facility costs, supplies, research consultants, depreciation and stock compensation expense. As a result of the acquisition of Perseid by Astellas in May 2011, our research and development expenses have been substantially reduced and are currently attributable to limited research and development activities related to our MAXY-G34 product candidate. Research and development expenses were $147,000 and $212,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $7,000 and $1.4 million in the comparable periods in 2011. The increase in research and development expenses from the three month period ended September 30, 2012 to the comparable period ended September 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to limited stability and analytical testing of our MAXY-G34 product candidate. The decrease in our research and development expenses from the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 to the comparable period ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to reductions in salary related costs and patent research expenses as a result of the cessation of substantially all research and development activities.

We expect our research and development expenses to continue to be limited and maintained well below historical levels. However, any further development of our MAXY-G34 product candidate that we may undertake in connection with a potential strategic combination or other transaction, could result in a significant increase in our research and development expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for finance, legal, general management, business development and human resources, stock compensation expense, insurance premiums, business consultants and professional expenses, such as expenditures for legal, accounting services and board fees. General and administrative expenses were $2.6 million and $7.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $2.3 million and $8.1 million in the comparable periods in 2011. The increase in our general and administrative expenses from the three month period ended September 30, 2012 to the comparable period ended September 30, 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in stock compensation expense due to an increase in the valuation of our contingent performance unit, or CPU, awards resulting from our recent cash distribution. This increase

was partially offset by the elimination of consulting expenses in connection with the proposal we submitted to BARDA in May 2011 and a decrease in patent administration costs. The decrease in our general and administrative expenses from the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 to the comparable period ended September 30, 2011 was primarily due to the reduction of consulting expenses, accounting fees and salaries and benefits. These decreases were partially offset by the elimination of expense allocations under our transition services agreement with Perseid, under which a portion of our administrative costs was previously reimbursed by Perseid, and an increase in stock compensation expense due to an increase in the valuation of our CPU awards.

We expect our general and administrative expenses for the remainder of 2012 to be comparable to, or slightly lower than, our average over the first nine months of 2012. However, our general and administrative expenses can vary, depending on, among other things, the use of external consultants, expenditures for legal and accounting services, and stock compensation charges pertaining to our CPU awards, which are remeasured to estimated fair value on a recurring basis. Our general and administrative expenses may increase significantly if we pursue any strategic transactions or may decrease if we further wind-down our operations.

Gain on Distribution of Equity Securities

In connection with the distribution to our stockholders on December 14, 2010 of substantially all of the Codexis, Inc. common stock we held, we retained shares of such stock on behalf of the holders of certain outstanding equity awards. As of September 30, 2012, we held 413,033 shares of such stock. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a gain on distribution of equity securities of $64,000 and $207,000, compared to $44,000 and $293,000 in the comparable periods in 2011, as a result of the release of such stock pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock awards.

Interest Income and Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest income and other income (expense), net, represents income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, foreign currency gains or losses, changes in value of stock portion of distribution payable and other expenses. Amounts included in interest income and other income (expense), net, are as follows (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2011			2012		2011		2012
Interest income	$	19		$	15	$	96	$	36
Foreign exchange gains (losses)		(8	)		8		3		(1	)
Change in value of stock portion of distribution payable		648			35		869		196
Loss on disposal of equipment		—			—		—		(4	)

Total interest income and other income (expense), net	$	659		$	58	$	968	$	227

The decreases in interest income and other income (expense), net from both of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 to the comparable periods ended September 30, 2011 were primarily as a result of the change in value of the stock portion of distribution payable.

Provision for Income Taxes

We recorded tax expense of $36,000 and $106,000 in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012. Tax expense was recorded in both periods as a result of the gain on Codexis, Inc. common stock in connection with the release of such shares upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. We recorded tax benefits of $727,000 and $3.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. These tax benefits were attributable to the tax effects of changes in unrealized gains on our available-for-sale investments in other comprehensive income and allocations of tax expense to discontinued operations.

Due to the expected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits, we do not believe we will have a material tax liability for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 associated with the receipt of the $30.0 million payment from Bayer and the resulting income from continuing operations through September 30, 2012. However, the calculation of our 2012 federal and state tax will be based on any additional operating activities conducted throughout the remainder of the year and any potential changes in applicable tax regulations.

Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $450,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 reflects the portion of the income of Maxygen Holdings LLC allocated to a third party member. Net income attributable to non-controlling interests of $310,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 reflects the portion of Perseid’s income allocated to Astellas, based on Astellas’ equity interest in Perseid.

Discontinued Operations

We did not record any income from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of the sale of Perseid to Astellas in May 2011. Income from discontinued operations of $58.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was primarily generated from the $62.2 million gain on the sale of Perseid to Astellas and secondarily from the operating activities of Perseid and its predecessor operation. The majority of these operating expenses were reimbursed by Astellas.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, we have financed our continuing operations primarily through private placements and public offerings of equity securities, research and development funding from collaborators and government grants and through the sale or license of various assets. As of September 30, 2012, we had $82.2 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased approximately 279,000 shares of common stock through a stock repurchase program at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.5 million. During 2011, we repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of our common stock under a stock repurchase program at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $12.3 million. Since we began repurchasing our common stock in 2009, we have repurchased a total of 12.5 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $67.9 million, through September 30, 2012.

In October 2010, we sold substantially all of the patents and other intellectual property rights associated with the Molecular Breeding™ directed evolution platform to Codexis and cancelled all payment and potential royalty obligations of Codexis to us relating to biofuels and other energy products, for $20.0 million. We received $16.0 million in cash upon closing of the sale in October 2010, with the remaining $4.0 million held in escrow, $2.0 million of which was released in November 2011 and $2.0 million of which was released in October 2012.

In December 2010, we completed a distribution to our stockholders of substantially all of the Codexis, Inc. common stock we held. In aggregate, we distributed approximately 5.4 million shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock to our stockholders on December 14, 2010. The 413,033 shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock that we continued to hold at September 30, 2012 primarily represent shares that are being retained by us on behalf of the holders of certain outstanding equity awards. We also made a special cash distribution of $1.00 for each outstanding share of our common stock in December 2010, equal to approximately $29.2 million in the aggregate.

In May 2011, Astellas acquired all of our interests in Perseid for $76.0 million in cash. Perseid, a former majority-owned subsidiary, included substantially all of our research and development operations and personnel. As a result of the acquisition of Perseid by Astellas, we have no further interests or obligations with respect to the business and operations of Perseid, except for the ongoing technology license agreement between the companies entered into as a part of the 2009 joint venture arrangement.

In May 2012, we received the final $30.0 million payment from Bayer related to the sale of our hematology assets to Bayer in July 2008.

On September 6, 2012 we made a special cash distribution of $3.60 for each outstanding share of our common stock, equal to approximately $98.5 million in the aggregate. For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, the distribution will be a dividend to the extent it is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. Federal income tax principles. Based on these rules, we currently estimate that less than 10% of the payment will be treated as a dividend for tax purposes, with the balance being a return of capital. This estimate is preliminary and subject to change based upon a comprehensive review and analysis of our historical results as well as actual results for the entire 2012 taxable year. Stockholders will receive a Form 1099-DIV in early 2013 notifying them of the portion of the special cash distribution that is treated as a dividend for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $24.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $6.5 million in the comparable period in 2011. The net cash provided by operating activities in the 2012 period was primarily attributable to the $30.0 million payment received from Bayer and the resulting net income from continuing operations, adjusted to exclude certain non-cash items, partially offset by a reduction in other accrued liabilities. The net cash used in operating activities in the 2011 period was primarily attributable to a loss from continuing operations, adjusted to exclude certain non-cash items and a reduction in accrued compensation and other accrued liabilities, partially offset by a collection of receivables from Perseid. The non-cash adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities for the 2011 period included an income tax benefit of $3.1 million, partially offset by $2.2 million in non-cash stock compensation, while the 2012 period included $2.1 million in non-cash stock compensation.

Net cash used in investing activities was $20.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $76.0 million in the comparable period in 2011. The net cash used in investing activities during the 2012 period was primarily attributable to purchases of available-for-sale securities in excess of maturities of such securities. The net cash provided by investing activities during the 2011 period was attributable to the sale of Perseid to Astellas.

Net cash used in financing activities was $101.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $10.8 million used in financing activities in the comparable period in 2011. The net cash used in financing activities during 2012 was primarily due to the $3.60 per share cash distribution paid in September 2012, repurchases of our common stock and the payment of a liquidating dividend to a minority investor in connection with the dissolution of Maxygen Holdings LLC. The net cash used in financing activities during the 2011 period was primarily due to repurchases of our common stock.

Net cash used in discontinued operations was $297,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. No cash was used in or provided by discontinued operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as a result of the acquisition of Perseid by Astellas in May 2011. The net cash used in discontinued operations in the 2011 period was primarily attributable to the payment of certain license fees.

The following are contractual commitments as of September 30, 2012, which consist solely of our operating lease obligations (in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Operating lease obligations	$	195	$	153	$	42	$	—	$	—

Total	$	195	$	153	$	42	$	—	$	—

As of September 30, 2012, we had $82.2 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.

Given that we continue to have large cash reserves, our board of directors expects to consider and evaluate additional distributions to our stockholders of a portion of our cash resources in excess of our limited future operational requirements, although none are specifically contemplated at the current time. Such distributions may be accomplished through cash dividends, stock repurchases or other mechanisms and may be fully or partially taxable depending on the circumstances of such distribution.

The amount and timing of any future distributions will also be largely dependent upon any amounts we consider appropriate to retain in order to pursue our ongoing strategic evaluation and to provide adequate reserves for any potential future liabilities and claims, such as liabilities and claims resulting from any potential future tax audits or legal proceedings.

For example, we remain subject to examination for certain tax years by U.S. Federal and state income tax authorities and by various international tax authorities, including years in which we did not incur a tax liability, despite the recognition of significant income and capital gains, due to our utilization of sufficient capital losses, net operating losses and certain tax credits. As a result, U.S. Federal and state income tax authorities could challenge tax positions we have taken with respect to these losses and credits, which may result in adjustments, penalties, interest and other amounts.

In particular, we recognized approximately $70.0 million in capital losses in the 2010 tax year pursuant to transactions involving Maxygen Holdings Ltd., our former Cayman Islands subsidiary, that resulted in a federal tax benefit of approximately $24.5 million. The transactions included the sale of a minority membership interest in Maxygen Holdings LLC, the then-parent company of Maxygen Holdings Ltd., to a third party for $200,000 in cash and a contingent promissory note and the subsequent liquidation of Maxygen Holdings Ltd. The related capital losses represented the accumulated tax basis of Maxygen Holdings Ltd., which was derived from the cash we contributed to Maxygen Holdings Ltd. since its formation in March 2000. These cash contributions funded the losses attributable to Maxygen Holdings Ltd., which were reflected in our consolidated statements of operations for each applicable reporting period. Since these transactions resulted in claimed losses in excess of certain threshold amounts, they represented “loss transactions” (as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.6011-4(b)(5)) and constituted “reportable transactions” under such treasury regulations. These regulations required us to make detailed disclosures regarding the transactions in our federal tax return for the 2010 tax year. Characterization of these transactions as reportable transactions may increase the likelihood that we will be audited for such tax year.

In addition, while we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings or otherwise aware of any potential or threatened claims, we may in the future become involved in claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. In any such legal proceeding, we could incur substantial legal fees in responding to the litigation and, if such litigation were to be decided adversely to us, we could be required to pay monetary damages and other amounts.

We cannot predict the likelihood of any potential future tax audits or legal proceedings and cannot guarantee the outcome of any such audits or legal proceedings. Any such audits or legal proceedings may result in material liabilities, such as adjustments, damages, penalties, interest and other amounts. The possibility of such audits and legal proceedings and our need to reserve amounts from time to time that we deem appropriate to cover any possible exposure from such potential future audits and legal proceedings could impede our ability to enter into a strategic transaction or effect a wind-down or dissolution and could significantly delay, and if they ultimately materialize, diminish, any future distributions to our stockholders.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk Management

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates and the price fluctuations of certain equity securities. There were no significant changes in our market risk exposures during the three months ended September 30, 2012. These activities are discussed in further detail in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Changes in Internal Control

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Currently, we are not a party to any legal proceedings that we believe would have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

A restated description of the risk factors associated with our business is set forth below. This description includes all material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this report, in considering our business and prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We have implemented a substantial restructuring of our operations over the past several years, which may make it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects.

In May 2011, a subsidiary of Astellas Pharma Inc., or Astellas, acquired our interests in Perseid Therapeutics LLC, or Perseid, a former majority-owned subsidiary that included substantially all of our research and development operations and personnel. The acquisition of Perseid by Astellas, our receipt of the final $30.0 million payment from Bayer HealthCare LLC and the distribution of approximately $98.5 million in cash to our stockholders in September 2012 are all part of a multi-year strategic process to restructure our operations and maximize stockholder value, a process that also included the sale or distribution of various other assets, such as our vaccines assets, the patent rights relating to the MolecularBreeding™ directed evolution platform, and substantially all of the shares of Codexis, Inc. common stock we held. In addition, we continue to focus our efforts on creating value from our MAXY-G34 program for our stockholders through a sale or other transaction involving the program and pursuing potential strategic options for our company as a whole. As a result, it may be difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects on the basis of historical operating performance.

If we are not able to consummate a strategic transaction for our MAXY-G34 product candidate, we may fail to realize any value from this program for our stockholders.

Our current non-financial assets primarily consist of our MAXY-G34 product candidate, a granulocyte colony stimulating factor, or G-CSF, and we continue to evaluate potential strategic options for our MAXY-G34 program, including a sale or other transaction involving the program. To date, we have not been successful in identifying any potential transaction for the MAXY-G34 program and there can be no assurances we will be successful in identifying and consummating any such transaction in the future. If we are unable to consummate a strategic transaction for our MAXY-G34 product candidate, we may fail to realize any value from this program.

Moreover, we have incurred, and may in the future incur, significant costs related to the continued evaluation of potential strategic options for our MAXY-G34 product candidate, including research and development expenses that we may incur in connection with any potential transaction, as well as legal and accounting fees and expenses and other related charges. We may also incur additional unanticipated expenses in connection with this process. A considerable portion of these costs will be incurred regardless of whether any such transaction is completed. These expenses will decrease the remaining cash available for use in our business or the execution of our strategic plan and may diminish or delay any future distributions to our stockholders.

The prospects for further development and commercialization of our MAXY-G34 product candidate are highly uncertain, which will likely make it more difficult for us to secure a strategic transaction or other arrangement for this product candidate or to realize any value for this program.

The further development and commercialization of our MAXY-G34 product candidate is subject to numerous significant risks, including, but not limited to, risks of failure inherent in drug development, risks associated with the maintenance of adequate protection of our intellectual property for this program and our ability to avoid the infringement of the intellectual property of third parties, competition from existing G-CSF products, as well as potential biosimilar G-CSF products, and risks that regulatory action may prevent or limit the commercial potential of the program.

Drug development and the conduct of preclinical studies, clinical trials and other studies, is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process. Further, results from preclinical testing in in vitro and animal models, as well as early clinical trials of our MAXY-G34 product candidate may not be predictive of results obtained in larger, later stage clinical trials. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that clinical trials or other studies of MAXY-G34 can be completed or produce sufficient safety and efficacy data necessary to obtain regulatory approval. In addition, our MAXY-G34 product candidate is based on modifications to a natural human protein and such altered properties may render MAXY-G34 unsuitable or less beneficial than expected for one or more diseases or medical conditions of possible interest or make the product candidate unsuitable for further development.

Our ability to realize any value for our MAXY-G34 program will depend in part on our ability to maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property for this program in the United States and other countries and to avoid infringing patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. In particular, we believe that the existence of a U.S. patent issued to Amgen in 2008 with certain claims to mutated G-CSF molecules (Patent No. 7,381,804) has made it more difficult for us to secure a strategic transaction or other arrangement for our MAXY-G34 product candidate or otherwise realize any value from this product candidate. While we are currently engaged in an inter partes reexamination of the Amgen patent with the U.S. Patent Office, or PTO, and the PTO has issued a right of appeal notice to Amgen maintaining the PTO’s rejection of the claims in the Amgen patent, Amgen is appealing this decision and any final ruling by the PTO may be appealed to the U.S. federal courts. As a result, there can be no assurances that we will ultimately prevail or do so in a timely manner, or that a third party would be successful in the development, commercialization or other utilization of the MAXY-G34 program, even if ultimately successful in this reexamination process.

If approved for sale by regulatory authorities for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, our MAXY-G34 product candidate would likely compete with already approved earlier-generation products based on the same protein, primarily Neulasta^® and Neupogen^®, and we would expect the product to face significant competition from biosimilar drug products. We are aware that Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Sandoz International GmbH are currently developing biosimilar G-CSF products to compete in this market. Further, even if regulatory approval to sell MAXY-G34 is received, the approved label may entail limitations on the indicated uses for which the product can be marketed and any failure to obtain broad labeling for this product allowing approved use with multiple chemotherapy regimens for multiple cancers would limit its adoption by hospital formularies and its commercial success.

We have been seeking government funding for the development of this program for the ARS indication and, in May 2011, we submitted a proposal to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, for the development of this product candidate as a potential medical countermeasure for ARS. However, in November 2011, our proposal was rejected by BARDA primarily due to BARDA’s lack of available funding. Although BARDA indicated that our MAXY-G34 program would be reconsidered by BARDA if the circumstances related to BARDA’s funding availability changed in the future, there can be no assurances that the circumstances related to BARDA’s funding availability will change, that BARDA will open a future solicitation applicable to the MAXY-G34 program or ARS, or that we would submit a proposal for, or be awarded a contract under, any potential future BARDA solicitation or any other government funded program. The rejection of our proposal by BARDA significantly impaired our ability to realize any value from this program.

Finally, our suspension of manufacturing and development activities for our MAXY-G34 product candidate for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in 2008 has likely had an adverse impact on the timeline for any potential commercialization of MAXY-G34 for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, which could limit any commercial potential of MAXY-G34.

Any of the foregoing factors could make it more difficult for us to identify and consummate a strategic transaction or other arrangement for our MAXY-G34 product candidate or realize any value for this program.

We may not be successful in identifying and implementing any strategic business combination or other transaction and any strategic transactions that we may consummate in the future could have negative consequences.

In addition to our efforts to maximize the value of our MAXY-G34 program, we also continue to evaluate all potential strategic options for the company, including a merger, reverse merger, sale, wind-down, liquidation, dissolution or other strategic transaction. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully consummate any particular strategic transaction. The process of continuing to evaluate these strategic options may be very costly, time-consuming and complex and we have incurred, and may in the future incur, significant costs related to this continued evaluation, such as legal and accounting fees and expenses and other related charges. We may also incur additional unanticipated expenses in connection with this process. A considerable portion of these costs will be incurred regardless of whether any such course of action is implemented or transaction is completed. Any such expenses will decrease the remaining cash available for use in our business and may diminish or delay any future distributions to our stockholders.

In addition, any strategic business combination or other transactions that we may consummate in the future could have a variety of negative consequences and we may implement a course of action or consummate a transaction that yields unexpected results that adversely affects our business and decreases the remaining cash available for use in our business or the execution of our strategic plan. For example, a transaction may require us to increase our near and long-term expenditures, pose significant integration challenges or result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that any particular course of action, business arrangement or transaction, or series of transactions, will be pursued, successfully consummated, lead to increased stockholder value, or achieve the anticipated results. Any failure of such potential transaction to achieve the anticipated results could significantly impair our ability to enter into any future strategic transactions and may significantly diminish or delay any future distributions to our stockholders.

We may choose to further wind down or dissolve the company, which may be a lengthy process, yield unexpected results and delay any potential distributions to our stockholders.

If we are not successful in consummating a strategic transaction for our company or for our MAXY-G34 program, we may decide to further wind down or cease all of our operations. We also may seek stockholder approval of a plan of liquidation so that we may liquidate all of our remaining assets, pay our known liabilities, distribute our remaining cash on hand (subject to the set aside of adequate reserves to cover known, unknown and contingent liabilities, including potential tax liabilities and potential claims in litigation) and dissolve.

However, any further wind-down or dissolution of our company may be a lengthy and complex process, yield unexpected results and delay any potential distributions to our stockholders. Such process may also require the further expenditure of company resources, such as legal and accounting fees and expenses and other related charges, which would decrease the amount of resources available for distributions to our stockholders.

We may make additional distributions to our stockholders of a portion of our cash resources, which may restrict our funds available for other actions and negatively affect the market price of our securities.

Given that we continue to have large cash reserves, our board of directors may consider and evaluate additional distributions to our stockholders of a portion of our cash resources in excess of our limited future operational requirements, amounts we consider appropriate to pursue our ongoing strategic evaluation and adequate reserves for potential future liabilities. Such distributions may be accomplished through cash dividends, stock repurchases or other mechanisms and may be fully or partially taxable depending on the circumstances of such distribution. Any such distribution may not have the effects anticipated by our board of directors and may instead harm the market price and liquidity of our securities or result in unintended tax consequences. The full implementation of any additional distribution could use a significant portion of our remaining cash reserves, and this use of cash could limit our future flexibility to operate our business, invest in our existing assets or pursue other transactions. In particular, our recent distribution of approximately $98.5 million in cash to our stockholders, and any future distribution we may make, could significantly impair our ability to enter into a strategic transaction for our MAXY-G34 program or for our company as a whole.

In addition, the implementation of certain distribution mechanisms, such as stock repurchases, could also result in an increase in the percentage of common stock owned by our existing stockholders, and such increase may trigger disclosure or other regulatory requirements for our larger stockholders. As a result, these stockholders may liquidate a portion of their holdings, which may have a negative impact on the market price of our securities. Furthermore, repurchases of stock may affect the trading of our common stock to the extent we fail to satisfy continued-listing requirements of the exchange on which our stock trades, including those based on numbers of holders or public float of our common stock. Under certain circumstances, stock repurchases could impact our ability to utilize certain tax benefits, including net operating losses. Any stock repurchases would also reduce the number of shares of our common stock in the market, which may impact the continuation of an active trading market in our stock, causing a negative impact on the market price of our stock.

Potential future liabilities and claims, such as liabilities and claims resulting from any potential future tax audits or legal proceedings, may result in material liabilities that could cause our stock price to decline or could impede our ability to enter into a strategic transaction or could significantly diminish or delay potential future distributions to our stockholders.

We remain subject to examination for certain tax years by U.S. Federal and state income tax authorities and by various international tax authorities. In addition, Danish tax authorities are currently auditing our Danish tax filings for the years 2007 through 2009. The years that remain subject to examination by U.S. Federal and state tax authorities include years in which we did not incur a tax liability, despite the recognition of significant income and capital gains, due to our utilization of sufficient capital losses, net operating losses and certain tax credits. As a result, U.S. Federal and state income tax authorities could challenge tax positions we have taken with respect to these losses and credits.

In particular, we recognized approximately $70.0 million in capital losses in the 2010 tax year pursuant to transactions involving Maxygen Holdings Ltd., our former Cayman Islands subsidiary, that resulted in the utilization of a federal tax benefit of approximately $24.5 million in that tax year. The transactions included the sale of a minority membership interest in Maxygen Holdings LLC, the then-parent company of Maxygen Holdings Ltd., to a third party for $200,000 in cash and a contingent promissory note and the subsequent liquidation of Maxygen Holdings Ltd. The related capital losses represented the accumulated tax basis of Maxygen Holdings Ltd., which was derived from the cash we contributed to Maxygen Holdings Ltd. since its formation in March 2000. These cash contributions funded the losses attributable to Maxygen Holdings Ltd., which were reflected in our consolidated statements of operations for each applicable reporting period. Since these transactions resulted in claimed losses in excess of certain threshold amounts, they represented “loss transactions” (as defined in Treasury Regulation §1.6011-4(b)(5)) and constituted “reportable transactions” under such treasury regulations. These regulations required us to make detailed disclosures regarding the transactions in our federal tax return for the 2010 tax year. Characterization of these transactions as reportable transactions may increase the likelihood that we will be audited for such tax year.

If we do not retain key employees, our ability to maintain our ongoing operations or execute a potential strategic option could be impaired.

As of September 30, 2012, we had six employees and we will rely heavily on the services of our existing employees to manage our ongoing operations and execute our strategic plans. The loss of services from any of our existing employees could substantially disrupt our operations. To be successful and achieve our strategic objectives, we must retain qualified personnel. Our recent restructurings and the continued review of our strategic options may create continued uncertainty for our employees and this uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees and to hire new talent necessary to maintain our ongoing operations or to execute additional potential strategic options, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, our current strategy and any changes to this strategy could place significant strain on our resources and our ability to maintain our ongoing operations. We may also be required to rely more heavily on temporary or part-time employees, third party contractors and consultants to assist with managing our operations. These consultants are not our employees and may have commitments to, or consulting or advisory contracts with, other entities that may limit their availability to us. We will have only limited control over the activities of these consultants and can generally expect these individuals to devote only limited time to our activities. Failure of any of these persons to devote sufficient time and resources to our business could harm our business.

Accordingly, we may fail to maintain our ongoing operations or execute our strategic plan if we are unable to retain or hire qualified personnel or to manage our employees and consultants effectively.

We expect to incur additional operating losses for the foreseeable future and will continue to incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company.

We currently have no significant source of revenues and expect that our operating expenses, including costs associated with operating as a public company, will exceed our revenues, if any, for the foreseeable future. In addition, we may incur increased expenses in connection with any research and development activities for our MAXY-G34 program that we may undertake in connection with any potential strategic transaction for the program or our company. These operating expenses will decrease the remaining cash available for use in our business or the execution of our strategic plan and will diminish any future distributions to our stockholders.

Litigation or other proceedings or third party claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to spend time and money, which could impede our ability to enter into a strategic transaction or could significantly diminish or delay potential future distributions to our stockholders.

In October 2010, we sold substantially all of the intellectual property rights and certain other assets relating to the MolecularBreeding™ directed evolution platform to Codexis. The intellectual property portfolio we sold to Codexis will continue to be subject to existing exclusive and nonexclusive licenses that we previously granted to third parties under agreements that we will remain a party to. These existing license agreements, the related sublicenses to third party technologies and the license agreement with Codexis, and the interplay between those agreements, are highly complex and rely on highly technical definitions to delineate permitted and restricted activities. As a result of this complexity, the agreements may be subject to differing interpretations by the counterparties that could lead to disputes or litigation, including for alleged breaches or claims that our activities or the activities of a third party are not covered by the scope of the licenses. Codexis, as the owner of these intellectual property rights, has the right to control prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of these patent rights. If Codexis or an acquirer of Codexis chooses not to enforce the intellectual property rights on which these licensees rely, or enforces those rights ineffectively and has them invalidated, the ability of these licensees to effectively use its licensed rights may be adversely impacted. While we have certain rights to continue prosecution or maintenance of patent rights that Codexis chooses to abandon, we may be unable to exercise these rights effectively.

While Codexis is obligated to comply with the terms of these agreements and to indemnify us for certain losses under these agreements, any action or omission by Codexis that causes us to breach any of our obligations under these agreements may subject us to liability and, to the extent indemnification by Codexis is not available, we may be required to pay damages to such third party. Any such litigation may divert management time from focusing on business operations and could cause us to spend significant amounts of money. If such litigation were to be decided adversely to us, we could be required to pay monetary damages.

We may be subject to costly product liability claims and may not have adequate insurance.

Because we have conducted clinical trials in humans in the past, we face the risk that the prior use of our product candidates may have resulted in adverse effects. We expect to maintain product liability insurance for these prior clinical trials, however, such liability insurance may not be adequate to fully cover any liabilities that arise from these clinical trials. We may not have sufficient resources to pay for any liabilities resulting from a claim excluded from, or beyond the limit of, such insurance coverage.

Any claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of the hazardous chemicals and radioactive and biological materials that we used, or may in the future use, in our business could be time-consuming and costly.

Our research and development processes have in the past involved the controlled use of hazardous materials, including chemicals and radioactive and biological materials and our operations have in the past produced hazardous waste products. Federal, state and local laws and regulations govern the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials. We may be sued for any injury or contamination that resulted from our use or the use by third parties of these materials. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations is expensive and any claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of the hazardous chemicals and radioactive and biological materials we use in our business could be time-consuming and costly.

Our business is subject to increasingly complex corporate governance, public disclosure and accounting requirements that could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We are subject to changing rules and regulations of federal and state government as well as the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and The NASDAQ Global Market, have issued a significant number of new and increasingly complex requirements and regulations over the course of the last several years and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to laws enacted by Congress. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted. The Dodd-Frank Act contains significant corporate governance and executive compensation-related provisions, some of which the SEC has recently implemented by adopting additional rules and regulations in areas such as executive compensation. If we fail to comply with the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Act and associated SEC rules, or any other regulations, we could be subject to a range of consequences, including the de-listing of our common stock from The NASDAQ Global Market, significant fines, or other sanctions or litigation. Our efforts to comply with these requirements have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, an increase in expenses and a diversion of management’s time from other business activities.

Our revenues, expenses and operating results are subject to fluctuations that may cause our stock price to decline.

Our revenues, expenses and operating results have fluctuated in the past and may do so in the future. These fluctuations could cause our stock price to fluctuate significantly or decline. Some of the factors that could cause our revenues, expenses and operating results to fluctuate include:

•

strategic alternatives and transactions with respect to our MAXY-G34 product candidate or our company and the timing, likelihood and outcome thereof;

•

our implementation, or our failure to implement, any additional distributions of our cash resources to stockholders;

•

our ability to estimate and maintain adequate reserves to fund our current and longer term operational requirements, pursue our on-going strategic evaluation and provide for potential future liabilities and claims, such as liabilities, claims, adjustments, penalties, interest and other amounts resulting from potential future tax audits or potential future litigation;

•

our ability to continue operations and our estimates for future performance and financial position of the company;

•

our ability to retain key employees to maintain our ongoing operations and, if necessary, our ability to successfully hire qualified personnel;

•

our ability to protect our intellectual property portfolio and rights; and

•

general and industry specific economic conditions.

Due to the possibility of fluctuations in our revenues and expenses, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance. Our operating results in some quarters may not meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors. In that case, our stock price would likely decline.

If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, we may not be able to preserve our cash balances or access such sources if necessary.

As of September 30, 2012, we had $82.2 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. While we maintain an investment portfolio typically consisting of money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities and short-term commercial paper and have not experienced any liquidity issues with respect to these securities, we may experience reduced liquidity with respect to some of our investments if current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen. Under extreme market conditions, there can be no assurance that we would be able to preserve our cash balances or that such sources would be available or sufficient for our business.

Our stock price has been, and may continue to be, volatile, and an investment in our stock could decline in value.

The trading prices of life science company stocks in general have experienced significant price fluctuations in the last several years and broad market and industry factors may decrease the trading price of our common stock, regardless of our performance or financial condition. In addition, our stock price could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:

•

our consummation, or our failure to consummate, any strategic transaction;

•

our implementation, or our failure to implement, any additional distributions of our cash resources to stockholders;

•

conditions or trends in the biotechnology and life science industries;

•

changes in the market valuations of other biotechnology or life science companies;

•

developments in domestic and international governmental policy or regulations;

•

changes in general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions, interest rate changes, terrorist acts and other factors;

•

developments in or challenges relating to our patent or other proprietary rights, including lawsuits or proceedings alleging patent infringement based on the development, manufacturing or commercialization of MAXY-G34; and

•

sales of our common stock or other securities in the open market.

In the past, stockholders have often instituted securities class action litigation after periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities. If a stockholder files a securities class action suit against us, we could incur substantial legal fees and our management’s attention and resources would be diverted from operating our business to respond to the litigation.

Substantial sales of shares may adversely impact the market price of our common stock.

Our common stock trading volume is low and thus the market price of our common stock is particularly sensitive to trading volume. If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares released pursuant to the vesting of equity awards, the market price of our common stock may decline. Significant sales of our common stock may adversely impact the then-prevailing market price of our common stock.

Volatility in the stock prices of other companies may contribute to volatility in our stock price.

The stock market in general, and The NASDAQ Global Market and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Further, there has been particular volatility in the market prices of securities of early stage and development stage life sciences companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs, potential liabilities and the diversion of management’s attention and resources, and could harm our reputation and business.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below summarizes information about repurchases of our common stock during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012.


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid per Share⁽²⁾		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs⁽¹⁾		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs⁽¹⁾
Jul. 1, 2012 through Jul. 31, 2012		—		—		—	$	8,472,130
Aug. 1, 2012 through Aug. 31, 2012		—		—		—	$	8,472,130
Sept. 1, 2012 through Sept. 30, 2012		—		—		—	$	8,472,130

Total		—		—		—	$	8,472,130

(1)

On January 10, 2012, we announced that our Board authorized a new stock repurchase program under which we are authorized to purchase up to $10.0 million of our common stock through December 31, 2012. The amount shown as available for future purchases reflects the amounts remaining under this authorization.

(2)	The price paid per share of common stock does not include any related transaction costs.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:



31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company